Data & Privacy
- Data Act
- Data Governance Act
- ePrivacy Directive
- GDPR
AI & Trust
- Artificial Intelligence Act
Cybersecurity
- Cybersecurity Act
- DORA
- NIS2
Digital Services & Media
- Digital Markets Act
- Digital Services Act
- European Media Freedom Act
Artificial Intelligence Act
- Recitals
CHAPTER I
GENERAL PROVISIONSArticles 1 — 4
CHAPTER II
PROHIBITED AI PRACTICESArticles 5 — 5
CHAPTER III
HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMSArticles 6 — 49
CHAPTER IV
TRANSPARENCY OBLIGATIONS FOR PROVIDERS AND DEPLOYERS OF CERTAIN AI SYSTEMSArticles 50 — 50
CHAPTER V
GENERAL-PURPOSE AI MODELSArticles 51 — 56
CHAPTER VI
MEASURES IN SUPPORT OF INNOVATIONArticles 57 — 63
CHAPTER VII
GOVERNANCEArticles 64 — 70
CHAPTER VIII
EU DATABASE FOR HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMSArticles 71 — 71
CHAPTER IX
POST-MARKET MONITORING, INFORMATION SHARING AND MARKET SURVEILLANCEArticles 72 — 94
CHAPTER X
CODES OF CONDUCT AND GUIDELINESArticles 95 — 96
CHAPTER XI
DELEGATION OF POWER AND COMMITTEE PROCEDUREArticles 97 — 98
CHAPTER XII
PENALTIESArticles 99 — 101
CHAPTER XIII
FINAL PROVISIONSArticles 102 — 113
ANNEXES
AIA Article 90. Alerts of systemic risks by the scientific panel
- 1.The scientific panel may provide a qualified alert to the AI Office where it has reason to suspect that:
- (a)a general-purpose AI model poses concrete identifiable risk at Union level; or
- (b)a general-purpose AI model meets the conditions referred to in Article 51.
- 3.A qualified alert shall be duly reasoned and indicate at least:
- (a)the point of contact of the provider of the general-purpose AI model with systemic risk concerned;
- (b)a description of the relevant facts and the reasons for the alert by the scientific panel;
- (c)any other information that the scientific panel considers to be relevant, including, where appropriate, information gathered on its own initiative.
Relevant Recitals for this Article
With a view to complementing the governance systems for general-purpose AI models, the scientific panel should support the monitoring activities of the AI Office and may, in certain cases, provide qualified alerts to the AI Office which trigger follow-ups, such as investigations. This should be the case where the scientific panel has reason to suspect that a general-purpose AI model poses a concrete and identifiable risk at Union level. Furthermore, this should be the case where the scientific panel has reason to suspect that a general-purpose AI model meets the criteria that would lead to a classification as general-purpose AI model with systemic risk. To equip the scientific panel with the information necessary for the performance of those tasks, there should be a mechanism whereby the scientific panel can request the Commission to require documentation or information from a provider.