Data & Privacy
AI & Trust
Cybersecurity
Digital Services & Media
TITLE I
General provisionsArticles 1 — 2
TITLE II — CHAPTER I
Mandate and objectivesArticles 3 — 4
TITLE II — CHAPTER II
TasksArticles 5 — 12
TITLE II — CHAPTER III
Organisation of ENISAArticles 13 — 28
TITLE II — CHAPTER IV
Establishment and structure of ENISA’s budgetArticles 29 — 33
TITLE II — CHAPTER V
StaffArticles 34 — 37
TITLE II — CHAPTER VI
General provisions concerning ENISAArticles 38 — 45
TITLE III
Cybersecurity certification frameworkArticles 46 — 65
TITLE IV
Final provisionsArticles 66 — 69
ANNEXES
The Management Board, composed of the representatives of the Member States and of the Commission, should establish the general direction of ENISA’s operations and ensure that it carries out its tasks in accordance with this Regulation. The Management Board should be entrusted with the powers necessary to establish the budget, verify the execution of the budget, adopt appropriate financial rules, establish transparent working procedures for decision making by ENISA, adopt ENISA’s single programming document, adopt its own rules of procedure, appoint the Executive Director and decide on the extension and termination of the Executive Director’s term of office.
The smooth functioning of ENISA requires that its Executive Director be appointed on grounds of merit and documented administrative and managerial skills, as well as competence and experience relevant to cybersecurity. The duties of the Executive Director should be carried out with complete independence. The Executive Director should prepare a proposal for ENISA’s annual work programme, after prior consultation with the Commission, and should take all steps necessary to ensure the proper implementation of that work programme. The Executive Director should prepare an annual report to be submitted to the Management Board, covering the implementation of ENISA’s annual work programme, draw up a draft statement of estimates of revenue and expenditure for ENISA, and implement the budget. Furthermore, the Executive Director should have the option of setting up ad hoc working groups to address specific matters, in particular matters of a scientific, technical, legal or socioeconomic nature. In particular, in relation to the preparation of a specific candidate European cybersecurity certification scheme (‘candidate scheme’), the setting up of an ad hoc working group is considered to be necessary. The Executive Director should ensure that the members of ad hoc working groups are selected according to the highest standards of expertise, aiming to ensure gender balance and an appropriate balance, according to the specific issues in question, between the public administrations of the Member States, the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and the private sector, including industry, users, and academic experts in network and information security.