Data & Privacy
AI & Trust
Cybersecurity
Digital Services & Media
CHAPTER I
GENERAL PROVISIONSArticles 1 — 2
CHAPTER II
PRIMARY USEArticles 3 — 24
CHAPTER III
EHR SYSTEMS AND WELLNESS APPLICATIONSArticles 25 — 49
CHAPTER IV
SECONDARY USEArticles 50 — 81
CHAPTER V
ADDITIONAL ACTIONSArticles 82 — 91
CHAPTER VI
EUROPEAN GOVERNANCE AND COORDINATIONArticles 92 — 96
CHAPTER VII
DELEGATION OF POWERS AND COMMITTEE PROCEDUREArticles 97 — 98
CHAPTER VIII
MISCELLANEOUSArticles 99 — 104
CHAPTER IX
DEFERRED APPLICATION, TRANSITIONAL AND FINAL PROVISIONSArticles 105 — 105
ANNEXES
While EHR systems specifically intended by the manufacturer to be used for processing one or more specific categories of electronic health data should be subject to mandatory self-certification, software for general purposes should not be considered to be an EHR system, even when used in a healthcare setting, and should therefore not be required to comply with this Regulation. That covers cases such as text-processing software used for writing reports that would then become part of written electronic health records, general-purpose middleware, or database management software that is used as part of data storage solutions.
This Regulation imposes a mandatory conformity self-assessment scheme for the harmonised software components of EHR systems to ensure that EHR systems placed on the Union market are able to exchange data in the European electronic health record exchange format and that they have the required logging capabilities. That mandatory conformity self-assessment, which would be in the form of an EU declaration of conformity by the manufacturer, should ensure that those requirements are fulfilled in a proportionate way, while avoiding an undue burden on Member States and manufacturers.
Manufacturers should affix in the accompanying documents of the EHR system, and where applicable on its packaging, a CE marking of conformity indicating that the EHR system is in conformity with this Regulation and, in respect of aspects not covered by this Regulation, with other applicable Union law which also requires the affixing of such marking. Member States should build upon existing mechanisms to ensure the correct application of the provisions on the CE marking of conformity under relevant Union law and should take appropriate action in the event of improper use of that marking.
It is necessary to provide for a clear and proportionate distribution of obligations corresponding to the role of each economic operator in the supply and distribution process of EHR systems. Economic operators should be responsible for compliance in relation to their respective roles in such process and should ensure that they make available on the market only EHR systems which comply with relevant requirements.