Data & Privacy
AI & Trust
Cybersecurity
Digital Services & Media
CHAPTER I
GENERAL PROVISIONSArticles 1 — 6
CHAPTER II
COORDINATED CYBERSECURITY FRAMEWORKSArticles 7 — 13
CHAPTER III
COOPERATION AT UNION AND INTERNATIONAL LEVELArticles 14 — 19
CHAPTER IV
CYBERSECURITY RISK-MANAGEMENT MEASURES AND REPORTING OBLIGATIONSArticles 20 — 25
CHAPTER V
JURISDICTION AND REGISTRATIONArticles 26 — 28
CHAPTER VI
INFORMATION SHARINGArticles 29 — 30
CHAPTER VII
SUPERVISION AND ENFORCEMENTArticles 31 — 37
CHAPTER VIII
DELEGATED AND IMPLEMENTING ACTSArticles 38 — 39
CHAPTER IX
FINAL PROVISIONSArticles 40 — 46
ANNEXES
Essential and important entities should also address risks stemming from their interactions and relationships with other stakeholders within a broader ecosystem, including with regard to countering industrial espionage and protecting trade secrets. In particular, those entities should take appropriate measures to ensure that their cooperation with academic and research institutions takes place in line with their cybersecurity policies and follows good practices as regards secure access and dissemination of information in general and the protection of intellectual property in particular. Similarly, given the importance and value of data for the activities of essential and important entities, when relying on data transformation and data analytics services from third parties, those entities should take all appropriate cybersecurity risk-management measures.
Where information which is classified in accordance with Union or national law is exchanged, reported or otherwise shared under this Directive, the corresponding rules on the handling of classified information should be applied. In addition, ENISA should have the infrastructure, procedures and rules in place to handle sensitive and classified information in accordance with the applicable security rules for protecting EU classified information.
With cyber threats becoming more complex and sophisticated, good detection of such threats and their prevention measures depend to a large extent on regular threat and vulnerability intelligence sharing between entities. Information sharing contributes to an increased awareness of cyber threats, which, in turn, enhances entities’ capacity to prevent such threats from materialising into incidents and enables entities to better contain the effects of incidents and recover more efficiently. In the absence of guidance at Union level, various factors seem to have inhibited such intelligence sharing, in particular uncertainty over the compatibility with competition and liability rules.
Entities should be encouraged and assisted by Member States to collectively leverage their individual knowledge and practical experience at strategic, tactical and operational levels with a view to enhancing their capabilities to adequately prevent, detect, respond to or recover from incidents or to mitigate their impact. It is thus necessary to enable the emergence at Union level of voluntary cybersecurity information-sharing arrangements. To that end, Member States should actively assist and encourage entities, such as those providing cybersecurity services and research, as well as relevant entities not falling within the scope of this Directive, to participate in such cybersecurity information-sharing arrangements. Those arrangements should be established in accordance with the Union competition rules and Union data protection law.